The greenhouse gospel according
to Bjorn Lomborg
Dr Bjorn Lomborg is the keynote speaker at this month’s AIE national
conference at the Sydney Superdome. People either love him or hate him.
There’s no middle ground. This report looks at why Dr Lomborg and his views
are getting plenty of air play on the world stage.
The AIE has secured a world-class keynote speaker in Dr Bjorn Lomborg
for its national conference at the Sydney Superdome late this month. Dr
Lomborg, a Dane, statistician at the University of Denmark, Aarhus, whose
new book The Skeptical Environmentalist goes against the tide by arguing
that the world’s environment is not in decline.
His address to the conference on the theme The Skeptical Environmentalist
Looks at Energy is therefore both topical and timely as notions of global
warming and its effects are being increasingly challenged. Dr Lomborg has
achieved something of celebrity status following his invitation to write
an essay for The Economist, which
presages his book, just published. He wrote his book after he sought,
as a self-confessed holder of ‘left-wing Greenpeace views’, to debunk the
position of the American economist Julian Simon, who has long doubted
many of the claims of the more radical environmentalists.
These include the notions that we are exhausting the world's natural
resources, the world’s population is exploding; biodiversity is seriously
threatened; and pollution, not least by greenhouse gases, is out of control.
He is not specifically doubting global warming, just the Kyoto-prescribed
cure. Dr Lomborg’s research was exhaustive and comprehensive. The result:
he ended up agreeing with Simon. Judging from his piece in The Economist,
he is particularly critical of the Kyoto Protocol, seeing this as being
extremely expensive, and ultimately counterproductive in terms of its stated
objective: the limiting of atmospheric emissions of carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases.
His message in an energy context is an important one for Australia,
given our stake in coal mining and export, the supply of LNG, and our competitive
advantages in energy-intensive industries such as aluminium smelting.
In a review of The Spektical Environmentalist (Cambridge $49.95) in
The Sydney Morning Herald, respected environment writer and commentator
James Woodford said that Lomborg’s argument came as a major shock to him.
“Things I have always considered serious threats to the future of mankind—the
loss of forests, biodiversity destruction, chemical pollution, climate
change, degradation of freshwater systems and overpopulation—he calls,
sarcastically, ‘the Litany’,”
Woodford wrote. “Lomborg accuses environmentalists of misrepresentation
and exaggeration . . . his is the first detailed and comprehensive attempt
to call the conservation movement to account. “He argues that there is
a kind of Calvinistic guilt associated with the progress our society has
made—in essence, he argues we are embarrassed at being such a successful
species.” Lomborg writes: “The constant repetition of the Litany and the
often heard environmental exaggerations has serious consequences. It makes
us scared and it makes us more likely to spend our resources and attention
solving
phantom problems while ignoring real and pressing (possibly non-environmental)
issues. That is why it is important to know the real estate of the world.
We need to get the facts and the best possible information to make the
best possible decisions.”
Woodford observes: “For 350 pages, backed up by nearly 3,000 footnotes,
the Danish statistician critically examines the slogans and arguments that
have galvanised much of the developed world into environmental action.
It is a book the green movement would love to see pulped ….” While
agreeing that human-induced climate change is underway and that its impact
will be immense — costing as much as $A10 trillion, Lomborg’s view is that
the cost of reducing greenhouse gases will nearly be as great as the predicted
impacts and the outcomes dubious.
He suggests that the money would be better spent on more tangible problems
such as saving endangered species, rainforests, rivers, and modernising
primitive, polluting industries in the developing world. He further suggests
that money spent reducing carbon dioxide emissions may be best spent on
renewable energy research.
“The cost of such energy research (attaining cold fusion so that industry
could be run at a fraction of the environmental downsides) would be orders
of magnitude cheaper than the cost of limiting carbon emissions,”
Lomborg writes.
His views will, at minimum, generate vigorous debate, ensuring that
the AIE national conference will without doubt, be Australia's premier
energy event this year. For further information about the AIE conference
see
full program details at the centre pages of Energy News, visit the
AIE website, at www.aie.org.au or contact conference Chairman Richard Hunwick,
telephone: (02) 9410 9834, fax: (02) 9410 9984.
More information about Dr Lomborg may be obtained from his website,
www.lomborg.org
Back